# Messenger Audio 2 (22-Oct-1982)

{% embed url="<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUo80Uj4YIk&list=PLT3FYocEyHAwM4vjkHYNGNT0rw0NgWuzp&index=1>" %}

(0:00) ... but not the idea. Just because they are bad Muslims, do you have to throw Islam overboard? (0:08) Just because there are no Sufis, there are Muslims. (0:14) But he said, with the invasion of the Mongols, all of the universities died out, (0:22) except for the ones that just taught the Hadith, the Sunnah, and the legal jurisprudence. (0:29) And that the great expansion of knowledge, the development of algebra, the flowering of Greek thought, (0:36) all of these things that happened in the first three centuries of Islam, were eliminated from the university system, (0:40) and free thought, and all the other things that are necessary for growth in a society, (0:44) were replaced by repeating things that were old. (0:47) They became just encrusted, and they never developed, any farther than that. (0:51) That's his argument against his own argument. (0:54) Yeah, I mean, it's funny, he turns himself around on himself, at one point, and he never admits it, he never realizes it. (0:59) What would be different if you take this condition of conditional? <mark style="color:red;">(1:03) Both are equal.</mark> (1:04) They are the same. <mark style="color:red;">(1:04) Yeah. I looked up condition in the dictionary and it said conditional</mark> (1:08) Same. Yeah. <mark style="color:red;">(1:10) But I thought this would attract more attention.</mark> (1:14) Did you see the passage there? I was referring to the authority of the... and then he gives a number of... <mark style="color:red;">(1:18) He just can't break away from the Sunnah, you know. It's very difficult for them. (1:22) What do you think of this page here that he just read?</mark> (1:29) And he says here, look, 200 years after the death of the prophet, the compilers rejected as untrustworthy 90%. Nobody did. (1:39) Why did they say the 10%? (1:43) Even those who put the 10%, doubted the 10%, but they didn't want to counter it. (1:49) Because they're compilers. (1:54) Nobody did that. It's a long story. (2:02) The same thing has happened in Christianity, where the word of the Pope has become equivalent to the word of the Bible. (2:11) Therefore, it doesn't involve the Church doctrine. (2:15) Church doctrine is more important than the teachings of Christ. (2:22) But one thing is good, at least now, because we have no organized clergy. (2:27) You know, you can always keep on doubting the Jesus song. (2:45) Did you want to read that? (2:46) Well, I don't really have time right now either, but I'd like to get it later, maybe after this. (2:51) Later in the semester, the end of the semester. (2:57) Sure, I'll have to look at it, because I have... (3:01) Maybe I'll never be able to get it approved by the department. (3:05) But I would like to... (3:07) I have to, you know, in the next four years, I think about writing a master's thesis for engineering. (3:14) Well, I haven't come up with a topic. I'm only starting in the program now. (3:17) First semester, actually. (3:19) It would be nice to include a numerical analysis of the Qur'an, (3:28) ensuring that the probabilities that a book could be produced like this, beyond human capacity, (3:35) and establishing some basis for making your decision. (3:43) Decision-making process in engineering. (3:47) You've got it on probability. (3:49) Nothing has absolute certainty. (3:52) If you're going to make a decision, I mean, the first thing you study is statistics and probabilities. (3:56) That's the first thing you study. (3:57) But those predictions are based on probability. (4:00) It's a matter of how much probability. (4:06) Only, of course, facts are 100% probable. (4:11) But that's because they were false, right? (4:14) But those predictions are based on probability. (4:19) What I'm talking about is a decision-making process, (4:23) or an attitude towards a decision-making process. (4:29) Yeah, okay, well, this is beyond that, okay? (4:33) Most of these people do not seem to have in their own, you know, any direction for their own... (4:40) I mean, you have to make, I mean, if you talk about engineering, (4:43) you have to talk about what is your basis for doing some kind of a system. (4:47) Is it going to be what normally is considered to be in the society? (4:51) Is it caused by something? (4:52) How does it make sense? (4:55) That's the normal way. (4:57) Regardless of what it does for you. (5:00) Well, country development is, I mean, really, it's wonderful. (5:04) The decision-making process, whether to go with this design or not, (5:07) would be in accordance with the course of the course of the course. (5:11) And maybe there are, and yet, I discovered, (5:13) when you put this down, (5:17) he has a suggestion. (5:19) When you do something good for society, (5:25) from the humanistic point of view, that is an end in itself. (5:28) But from the Qur'anic point of view, you do good for society, (5:31) you do good for Allah. (5:32) I've said so in his book, the Great Deed. (5:38) Therefore, (5:39) you know, (5:41) in Islam, it's a duty (5:43) to bring about a good society (5:48) and a progressive society. (5:50) You know that's what the Qur'an says. (5:53) But in the modern man, (6:02) The mentality now, if you make profit, then that's, (6:06) by axiomatically, it's good. (6:09) It's what in philosophy we call utilitarian ethics. (6:12) A pragmatic ethic. (6:16) In a highly industrialized society, (6:18) what makes money is equivalent to what is good. (6:22) Whether it's good for the greatest number or not is something else. (6:26) He's making a statement here. (6:28) He says, (6:30) Islamic democracy being idealistic and absolute value-oriented, (6:34) the inner-directedness of its political and technical elites (6:37) generates a fifth type of that freedom of response. (6:40) He uses Gibb and Calhoun. (6:42) Yeah, he relies a lot on Gibb and Calhoun. (6:46) Elites are required to look upon power and authority as a trust. (6:50) They are motivated through an inner compulsion (6:52) to anticipate and ratify as far as possible (6:55) the latent, diffuse, or effective beliefs (6:58) of the people before these become greater than their own. (7:04) He's quoting somebody. (7:05) No, that's an 80-something. <mark style="color:red;">(7:08) That's a very good example.</mark> (7:09) As-salamu alaykum. <mark style="color:red;">(7:09) Wa Alaikum Salam (7:12) I mean, God has nothing against the Prophet, (7:14) but he's telling us don't follow his behavior. (7:20) That rules out sunnah right there</mark> (7:22) I was just telling him about an incident (7:27) my wife would teach me about the Koran class at the MSA (7:30) where someone was saying about the hadith. (7:33) Apparently, this guy has actually modified his position. (7:36) The hadith are not divine revelation like the Koran. He backed up. (7:40) Only they're divine revelation in the sense that (7:44) the Prophet's life is grounded in the Koran. (7:49) Someone was saying, when I don't understand the Koran, (7:52) then I go to the hadith for interpretation. (7:55) And my wife said, (7:57) why do you go to the hadith? (7:58) Why don't you go to God? (7:59) God is the only one who is going to guide you. (8:01) That's it. (8:02) Very good point. (8:04) That's exactly the point. (8:05) I thought that was a good thing for them to say. (8:07) You know, (8:09) you look at one book and you don't understand it, (8:11) so you look at another book. <mark style="color:red;">(8:12) Which is more complicated, actually. (8:15) It's a lot more difficult. (8:16) Books of hadith were written by people with different dialects, (8:19) different nationalities.</mark> (8:23) And they had complex minds, too. <mark style="color:red;">(8:27) Local dialects.</mark> (8:30) But we're reducing it all down to the English language, (8:32) so in one sense, that's not a problem. (8:34) But the question of... <mark style="color:red;">(8:36) Yeah, but how do you bring it down? (8:37) You don't understand the original text.</mark> (8:40) How nice this... (8:41) It's very difficult. (8:42) Very... (8:42) How nice this... (8:44) Batik? (8:45) Yes. (8:46) Batik? (8:47) Batik. (8:48) Yeah, I knew that, but I didn't... (8:56) He's quoting a lot of... (8:58) These are all lists of quotes in the Koran. (9:02) No, he doesn't quote a lot of them. (9:03) This is where he's making a statement about... (9:06) If one will take a watermelon and... (9:08) It's probably worth reading. (9:10) It's very well written. (9:11) No, I think some of the points he makes are quite valid. (9:13) I mean, because if you can recognize where he contradicts himself... (9:16) I think some of the points he makes are quite valid, (9:18) and I think what he's trying to do is really present an Islamic basis for system, isn't it? (9:25) He's not saying that... (9:28) You know, if you have an Islamic basis, (9:30) anybody who has an Islamic basis in their life, (9:32) whatever they do is going to, you know\... (9:35) They're free to do whatever makes good sense. (9:38) I don't have such bad eyesight, but sometimes I can see. (9:45) The engineer's making... (9:46) If he's got an Islamic basis for himself, (9:49) he's going to make decisions from that basis. (9:53) He doesn't have to look to the system to judge the problem directly. (10:01) You know what I'm saying? (10:04) No, but the system's approach, in general, (10:08) tries to give more and more integrative unity in the thinking process. (10:14) That's to say, you know, what I'm trying to say is, (10:17) the chair is part of the room, the room is part of the house, (10:20) the house is part of the community, the community is part of the room. (10:23) That kind of a mentality. (10:25) And if you really look at Islam, it's a very system-oriented approach. (10:29) Yeah, but I mean, you could have... (10:30) You can't unify everything because... (10:34) It's based on the principle of... (10:36) You know, a system can be made of objects or something there, (10:39) but are they required to be there? (10:42) That's another level of... (10:43) You know, in Islam... (10:45) I mean, to me, basically, the whole scientific thing is, (10:48) if you don't follow this idea, (10:52) you know, which is set down in the laws of nature, (10:55) if you try to defy the laws of gravity in order to make a plane fly, (11:00) you have to work with it, not deny it. (11:03) Yeah, but it's not so evident in the realm of ethics and values. (11:07) Because most engineering decisions, (11:09) when you talk about them, they're made on a utilitarian level. (11:13) Is it useful? Is it cost-effective? (11:15) Or in here, they're actually made on political choices. (11:18) Yeah, but I mean, this book is trying to put it in a more Islamic light. (11:21) It's talking about the reality of life in 1982 in America. (11:25) If it makes money for a big company, then it's good, (11:27) regardless of whatever else it may be. (11:32) But if in the long run, it goes against the good of society, (11:35) then it's against the good of the big company, too. (11:40) Unfortunately, these people are very short-sighted. (11:44) If they weren't so short-sighted, (11:45) they would have much more respect for the environment. (11:48) They would have much more of a slow attitude on development and nuclear energy, (11:53) which we don't fully understand. (11:55) And there would be much less of an attempt to increase. (11:58) Here, what I object to in the American culture, (12:03) is the instilling in television and media of the consumer mentality, (12:08) in which a person from the day he becomes a reward television (12:10) until the day he dies, he must be encouraged to buy something, (12:14) whether you need it or not, (12:15) whether it has any value in life or not. (12:18) Consume and produce, consume and produce, consume and produce. (12:20) This mentality, it's a hyper, super-hyper materialism, (12:23) which we've never known in the world before to this day, (12:26) where the mass of people, (12:28) the great mass of people are now able to consume (12:30) at a level that was never possible in the past. (12:35) If I am very vulgar myself, (12:37) the only alternative seems to be escaping to the third world, (12:41) to some place where it isn't. (12:43) I unfortunately have to work. (12:47) We will miss you, but another two months, (12:49) this schedule will be over. (12:51) Remember, work is a form of worship. (13:09) I have to see what my... (13:12) Why don't you go to the university office? (13:15) Well, I... (13:16) I'm taking three units, but... (13:19) Yeah, I can sign it up to... (13:21) Well, I mean, I could take it back and get it out on my own, too, (13:24) but it'd be the same amount of time. (13:26) But I don't have the time. (13:29) Yeah. (13:29) Well, I think you should. (13:30) I'd like to read it, but I don't think I have time right now. <mark style="color:red;">(13:38) We're reading the Quran over again (13:41) because we are starting over again (13:43) and the verse number where we stopped was (14:10) before we get to this (14:14) we really have to thank God for (14:18) enlightening us for being ... (14:22) because there was actually a tremendous parrallaism (14:26) that was discovered (14:29) last week (14:32) between Al-Fatihah and Al-Baqarah. Surah number 1 and surah number 2 (14:42) When you read towards the end of Al-Fatihah, (14:45) you say, (14:47) the path of those whom you bless, (14:54) not those who deserve wrath, (15:00) nor the strayers. (15:02) And then we come to surah number two, (15:04) and we find the three kinds of people. (15:06) First, the righteous. (15:10) This is the righteous. (15:14) And then, the disbelievers. (15:17) This is 'ghayral magdoobi alayhim, (15:20) The ones that incur or deserve wrath. (15:26) wa la da-leen is the third group, the hypocrites. (15:29) So now what do we think about? (15:30) I've been thinking about it the whole week. (15:32) And some of the people came to me and said (15:35) that now they have a whole new perspective on the reading al-Fatihah. (15:40) Fatimah was one of them. (15:42) Because when you're reading, (15:44) siratal lazeena an amta alayhim (15:45) you think of the righteous and all their definitions in surah number two. (15:48) and then when you say 'ghayral magdoobi alayhim (15:52) you're thinking of the people, the disbelievers, Who deserve wrath. (15:57) wa la da-leen ( The last words in Al-Fatihah, (15:59) when you read it we think of the last two groups (16:03) as detailed in surah number two, (16:06) which is the hypocrites. (16:09) Now when you think about it (16:11) alazeena an amta alayhim, those whom you blessed (16:14) are the righteous.  (16:16) this is easy. (16:19) 'ghayral magdoobi alayhim, those who deserve wrath are (16:24) the disbelievers (16:27) they just have only two verses describing them (16:30) in surah number two, as you see (16:32) wa la da-leen no da-leen, who are da-leen? (16:36) the strayers. The strayers means somebody who started on the path, (16:40) and then got lost. (16:42) Lost his way. (16:43) He strayed off. (16:45) So these are the hypocrites. (16:46) Because the hypocrites, (16:48) they come to Quran. (16:50) And they come to Islam. (16:52) And then, somehow, they deviate. (16:55) So we're praying to God not to make us among those. (16:58) The rafaleen. (17:00) And it is an incredible observation that Deen Mahmood made (17:03) last week, (17:05) in that it uses the same word, (17:07) that the hypocrites are the ones who chose the straying (17:10) using the same word as we see in al-fatiha (17:14) instead of the guidance. (17:18) So the Arabic words, (17:21) are quite terrible (17:24) so now when you read al-fatiha you have a whole new perspective (17:28) and you can see the connection, (17:30) even though between Al-Fatihah and Al-Baqarah (17:35) were 13 years and (17:38) how many miles between Mecca and Medina, my - do you remember? 200? 300 miles? something like that (17:45) Between the first surah and the second surah (17:49) are 13 years and 200 miles. (17:53) But you see the connection that is absolutely (17:57) very watertight. (18:06) It proves that the Quran was actually written down (18:10) before the creation of the heavens and the earth. (18:13) But it was revealed on occasions. (18:18) Like when the Prophet turned away and frowned (18:20) from the blind, poor person. (18:23) Now this was written before Muhammad was ever born. (18:26) But it was revealed immediately after he did that. (18:29) It was released right after that. (18:32) The description of the Battle of Badr (18:35) was written before the earth was created, (18:38) but it was revealed immediately after the Battle of Badr. (18:41) And so forth. (18:44) So the revelation of Quran over a period of 23 years (18:47) was scattered. (18:49) And the verses and the surahs were (18:51) separated in time and place. (18:54) But the whole Quran, ... (18:56) was written down before the creation of the heavens and the earth</mark> (19:04) I don't want to take time . (19:07) Can I elaborate on what you're saying, sir? (19:10) I made some notes here, but (19:11) I cannot depend anymore on my memory. (19:13) I'm getting old. (19:16) What I'm going to say is just (19:19) something to think about. (19:22) I'm not pushing it, (19:23) because I'm not very sure of it myself. (19:27) But I think if Allah decides, (19:31) we don't go against Allah into error. (19:34) I would like to point to (19:37) six, verse six of surah one. (19:42) And in Arabic it is (19:47) ihdina sirat al-mustaqeem. (19:50) Just like you've been thinking about this for one week. (19:52) I've been thinking about it for one week. (19:56) It's this word, mustaqeem. (20:01) All the translations I've seen (20:04) are either straight, wrong, (20:07) or right. (20:09) They mean the same, actually. (20:10) And that's one thing that's very good in English. (20:12) When you say he's on the right path, (20:14) he's on the correct path, (20:16) he's on the straight path. (20:19) Now, I think ordinary Arabic also, (20:22) if I remember right, (20:23) this is the same word. (20:25) Always the right path. (20:26) The straight path, the correct path, (20:28) or the path that you ought to go. (20:31) Or the true path, so. (20:35) Now I was studying, (20:37) I was studying the root. (20:41) The root, (20:43) and here's where you have to help us, (20:45) the root of mustaqeem. (20:48) And I found out that there are two letters. (20:52) T, ta, and qaf. (20:56) So what entered my mind immediately, (21:00) although this is where I'm not sure if I'm correct, (21:03) is T and Q is also found in taqwa, (21:06) which means righteousness. (21:09) So I said, well, consult the dictionary. (21:14) So I went to (21:16) to the arrangement of taqwa. (21:20) Taqwa, there are many versions. (21:23) Talks of taqwas, righteousness, (21:26) and this is the most normal translation, so and so. (21:29) But I never found the word mustaqeem (21:32) under the heading of taqwa. (21:35) So I said, these are ordinary dictionaries, (21:37) I'll go to a Qur'anic dictionary by Penner. (21:40) The same thing. (21:41) Under taqwa, which is righteousness, (21:44) you're going to find the word mustaqeem (21:46) as one of the verbs. (21:50) So I went to (21:53) straight, or the verb qalama, (21:56) or karma. (21:58) And very interesting, (22:00) where the word qiyama, you know, also, (22:02) because the day of qiyama is the day of resurrection. (22:05) Because that's the day when you will stand up. (22:09) Also when you say takbir, that's qiyama. (22:12) And also, and so on. (22:15) Qiyama really also means the safe path. (22:18) And this dictionary says, (22:21) but this is what he says, the man, (22:23) in the Qur'anic dictionary. (22:25) He says mustaqeem (22:28) is based on the root qalama, (22:30) which means to stand up. (22:32) But he says, in the form it is, (22:35) it means righteous. (22:39) So I was thinking that, (22:41) in development of the, (22:43) it seems that these roots in original Arabic (22:45) meant the same. (22:46) T and Q meant straight, righteousness, and so on. (22:50) But as Arabic became more and more literary, (22:53) then it acquired new meanings. (22:55) And so, maybe, a guide to us (22:58) is always trying to go to the root. (23:02) Now, if this dictionary is correct, (23:04) if he puts mustaqeem under straight and so on, (23:08) number six can be read as follows. (23:11) It's just supporting the tradition that we have. (23:14) They're asking Allah, (23:15) guide us in the path of righteousness. (23:18) I'm supporting our atelier now, right? (23:22) Guide us on the path of righteousness, (23:26) the path of those whom you bless, (23:30) not those of the hypocrites, (23:35) nor, excuse me, (23:37) not that of the disbelievers, (23:39) nor of the hypocrites. (23:41) Which, as we say now, (23:43) is going differently to the understanding. (23:47) However, there is something that has bothered me, (23:50) that I think, in my own modest way, (23:52) and I would like to share it with you. (23:59) Looking at the versions of, (24:03) it's very good to talk of this manar, (24:04) this taqseer of manar of the Egyptians, (24:09) even Zamakhshari, (24:12) they all seem to be a little bit hesitant (24:17) in making a difference between (24:21) those who deserve wrath and the slaves. (24:24) A lot of the discussions has gone on (24:26) in difference between these. (24:28) But none of them has hit what we have been able to get. (24:31) None of them, as far as I know. (24:34) None of them. (24:39) Zamakhshari, Bailawi, Ibn Athir, and Manar, (24:43) which is on the last page of it. (24:45) None of them said that the answer is on the next page. (24:50) But they give us a lot of distinction (24:52) between those who deserve wrath (24:54) and those who are astray. (25:00) I think the conclusion of this opinion (25:03) is that we must not look at the hypocrites (25:11) and the kuffar, that is disbelievers, (25:15) as completely separate. (25:17) If we think that they are two different groups, (25:20) we will not be able to understand the Quran. (25:24) Now, be patient with me please. (25:26) Let us go to chapter 2, verse 8. (25:35) These are the hypocrites. (25:38) But look what Allah says. (25:40) The hypocrites, then there are those who say (25:42) we believe in God and the last day, (25:46) while they are not believers. (25:48) These are the hypocrites. (25:49) Therefore the hypocrites are also disbelievers. <mark style="color:red;">(25:54) the disbelievers will say we are disbelievers.</mark> (25:58) Yes then let us go to 19. (26:02) Verse 19. (26:04) After talking of the disbelievers and the hypocrites, (26:09) Allah says, after summarizing the characteristics, (26:12) He encompasses the disbelievers. (26:15) From this, and I don't want to take so much time, (26:18) we can arrive at the conclusion (26:22) that all hypocrites are disbelievers. (26:26) But not all disbelievers are necessarily hypocrites. (26:31) Because there are some people who say immediately (26:33) I do not believe, and they mean it. (26:37) And so, to use the language of mathematics, (26:42) the hypocrites form a subset (26:45) of the unbelievers. (26:50) If this interpretation is correct, dear brothers and sisters, (26:55) then let us go to 7 and 8 of Baqara again. (27:03) Surah 7, Allah seals their hearts. (27:06) These are the disbelievers, they are hearing. (27:08) Places veils upon their hearts. (27:10) They have deserved terrible retribution. (27:12) Now, 8. (27:14) Then there are those who say. (27:16) This must now be interpreted in brackets. (27:19) Then there are those among the disbelievers who say. (27:26) Among the disbelievers, there are those who say. (27:29) These are the hypocrites. (27:31) If you will accept this interpretation, (27:35) the rest of the chapter becomes very clear (27:38) why Allah says that these hypocrites really don't believe. (27:41) Another time, he just talks of disbelievers. (27:45) So, I'll put it this way. (27:47) All hypocrites are disbelievers, (27:50) but not all disbelievers are necessarily hypocrites. (27:54) And therefore, Allah is angry also at the ... (28:00) And as you mentioned, Ustad, (28:02) you cannot be astray from the path (28:03) unless you were there from the very beginning. (28:08) And that's why they have to live (28:09) in the lowest or hottest part of hell. (<mark style="color:red;">28:12) Because they saw the straight path.</mark> (28:16) There is no excuse. (28:17) They are those who are really ungrateful.


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://rashad-khalifa-audios-and-videos.gitbook.io/rashad-khalifa-audios-and-videos/messenger-audios/messenger-audio-2-22-oct-1982.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
